1799 (ca. 1800) Washington Skull and Crossbones Funeral Medal. Musante GW-71, Baker-165A, Fuld Dies 1-A1. Silver. Fine Details--Bent (PCGS).121.0 grains. Pierced for suspension, as issued. Slightly mottled deep gray and blue patina with high points of the design being a bit lighter. The usual marks consistent with a long-used medal (this being a type intended for "use" rather than storage), with a nicely worn suspension hole that illustrates that the early 19th century Masonic brother who bought this displayed it on his person for many years. A few blunt central dents are noted in the reverse but are not too distracting. The iconic skull and bones is sharp and the legends fairly clear. Quite rare, much more so than the silver Funeral Urn types, and an undisputed favorite amongst the early Washington medals.<p>While the more typically seen Funeral Urn medals and oval shells in gold were clearly sold to the public at large, the Skull and Crossbones type was for a more limited, specific audience, and for adornment during a singular momentous occasion. As with the Urn medals, these were produced by Jacob Perkins. He was a member of the Masonic Brotherhood, and this type was expressly for the Masonic funeral procession in Boston. While it was reported that some 1,600 participants convened for the Masonic procession, the rarity of this medal today renders it unthinkable that any number approaching that would have been produced. Most likely, Perkins would have made as many as he thought he might be able to reasonably sell to fellow local Masonic brothers in advance of their convergence upon Boston for the February 11th event.<p>An announcement of the planned Masonic procession in Boston appeared in newspapers in that city as well those in the New England communities of Salem, Newburyport, Portland, Worcester, Springfield, Northampton, Stockbridge, Leominster and Dedham for several days in order to gather the Masonic Brotherhood to publicly honor Washingtons memory. The event seems to have been initially reported as planned for February 22 in some publications, and later corrected to February 11. Bostons <em>Russells Gazette</em> advertised in their January 16 edition that the event would be on the 22nd of February, while a very similar notice appeared in Bostons <em>Columbia Centinel</em> with amended wording placing the event on February 11. This might be reflective of differences of opinion as to which date was most appropriate, as the actual date of Washingtons birth was February 11, 1731. Once the Julian calendar was abandoned in favor of the Gregorian, in 1752, the birth date became February 22, 1732. This was only a change of 11 days, but at the time of Washingtons birth, the English standard included March 1 as the beginning of the calendar year. When this shifted to January 1, the year of his birth changed as well.<p>The <em>Centinel</em> notice read, in part:<p><em>The formation of the Grand Procession will commence at ten oclock; and at half past 11, will move from the Old State-House, to the Old South Meeting House, with the consent of the Proprietors, where an Eulogy will be pronounced by the Hon Brother Timothy Bigelow.</em><p><em>The Officers of the Lodges are requested to bring with them their jewels, the collars of which are to be shrouded in black crepe.</em><p><em>By direction of the most worshipful Samuel Dunn, grand master of Massachusetts.</em><p>Perkins would have had to work with diligent focus to prepare the dies and strike the funeral medals, as the earliest processions were dated within a month of Washingtons passing. The fairly large number of dies suggests he had little interruption in the process.From the John D. Miner Collection.
